05.15.05
National Assembly election results
Yesterday was election day for the National Assembly in Taiwan. The two most important figures were: 83% of people voted for parties supporting constitutional reform, while turnout was just over 23%. The low turnout was not a surprise (especially given the atrocious weather yesterday), while the high support rate for constitutional reform was very good news. It means that the constitutional reform package (described here) is almost certain to be passed, which is a major step forward for politics in Taiwan.
A loss for the smaller parties
The two mainstream parties were the main ‘winners’ of the election: the DPP with 42% and the KMT with 38% of the vote. The TSU and PFP parties got 7% and 6% respectively - which must call into doubt their long term futures; although part of the reason for their low polling was their position on this election (why would anyone vote for parties opposing much needed reform?), the low turnout should have worked to their advantage - moderate voters (i.e. the ones who didn’t turn up yesterday) tend to vote for the two big parties. The TSU are claiming a success, because they displaced the PFP as the 3rd biggest party - but the truth is simply that the PFP support collapsed more than the TSUs.
Nothing to do with trips to China and President Chen’s response
The standard newspaper take on this election was that it would be a virtual referendum on the KMT & PFP trips to the mainland, and President Chen Shui Bian’s response. Here are 10 reasons why this was never the case:
- This election was about constitutional reform - which had nothing to do with the relationship with China, or the recent trips
- The two main parties at odds over the recent trips (the DPP & KMT) held exactly the same position on this election (supporting constitutional reform), making it hard to vote for/against links with China.
- The two parties that visited China (the KMT & PFP) held diametrically opposite positions on this election, making it impossible to vote ‘for’ those trips.
- Each ballot allowed 1 vote for a political party - not for/against the government or president
- Chen is no longer the chairman of the DPP, and does not control DPP policy - so a vote for the DPP is not a vote for Chen Shui Bian
- Chen’s position on several issues has been markedly different to that of a lot of DPP politicians lately (in particular, his response to the Lien/Soong trips to China was a lot milder than the DPPs). His influence with party members is probably weaker now than at any time in the DPPs history. There are plenty of staunch DPP voters who disapprove of Chen’s recent actions.
- The different parties campaigned in very different ways for this election - affecting the results. The DPP campaigned on the issues, the KMTs campaign was based on Lien Chan’s ‘peace trip’ to China, while the TSU & PFP hardly campaigned at all
- Only 23% of the electorate voted - meaning that moderate voters (who may have altered their opinions on the different parties over the China trips) were hardly represented at all
- There are opinion polls almost every day in Taiwan. Why would the electorate of Taiwan use an election about one issue to feedback to the government on a completely separate issue?
- The main news story in the last week has not been James Soong’s trip to China, nor fallout from Lien Chan’s visit, nor reaction from the government to these trips. The main news story has been about the suicide of a Taiwanese ‘media personality’; while the China trips have been big news, they have not been the earth-shattering events for Taiwan that some international newspapers have made out
STOP_George said,
May 22, 2005 at 7:21 am
It’s hard not to separate recent developments from this NA election. Even though the Anti-secession law and the treachorous trips by Lien and Soong were not the issues people voted for in the NA election, I would find it hard to believe that they were not in the back of people’s minds when they were voting.
I especially have a problem with your #2 point: “…The two main parties at odds over the recent trips (the DPP & KMT) held exactly the same position on this election (supporting constitutional reform), making it hard to vote for/against links with China.”
Why is this so?
If you support pro-unification and agree with the reforms, you vote for the KMT.
If you support pro-official-independence and agree with the reforms, you vote for the DPP.
If you support pro-unification and don’t agree with the reforms, you vote PFP.
If you support pro-official-independence and don’t agree with the reforms, you vote TSU.
Very simple.
Therefore, this INDEED was an indication that Lien and Soong’s trip DID backfire somewhat and the pro-official-independence is as strong as ever. As for the rain, it was mostly raining in KMT territory (the north). Lien is now a 3-time loser (and counting).
David said,
May 22, 2005 at 12:55 pm
Hmm, maybe. I’m not saying that the recent events didn’t have any impact - but that it was just one of many factors. The reason for this post was that I was getting increasingly pissed off with news reports before the election along the lines of “This is seen as a referendum on cross-strait links” which completely failed to mention what the election was ACTUALLY about.
My personal opinion is that the only people who voted were either ‘party faithful’ (who wouldn’t have changed their vote) or people who actually cared about the issues (the grand majority of who would have been for reform). I’ll grant you that the ‘issue’ voters could choose either pro/anti independence parties … but I suspect that the fact that the DPP was the only party which bothered to campaign on the issues would have had a bigger impact than opinions on Chen vs Lien.
united health care medicare complete said,
February 14, 2008 at 9:46 pm
united health care medicare complete…
complacency widget unwieldy tiniest …
family dental plan insurance said,
February 15, 2008 at 6:18 pm
family dental plan insurance…
bobolink recalibrates academic …
keno said,
March 4, 2008 at 2:42 am
keno…
discouragement?modifiers mines truant?…
login said,
May 20, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Hi! Nice site you got there!
insurance drive small business deals line principalgroup com lexington fayette ky scion tc said,
September 9, 2009 at 3:40 am
insurance drive small business deals line principalgroup com lexington fayette ky scion tc…
alive Yugoslav.totaled …
car insurance ratings said,
September 9, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Spent some great time in your site, really enjoyed it
www discover poker net said,
September 11, 2009 at 10:21 pm
www discover poker net…
risky Urbana!Schultz escort …
www casino absolute slots com said,
September 12, 2009 at 10:56 pm
www casino absolute slots com…
harbor Lubell?bargained cartwheel …
login said,
September 13, 2009 at 3:41 am
This site is put together well!
low price vehicleinsurance new drivers american family said,
September 13, 2009 at 9:55 pm
low price vehicleinsurance new drivers american family…
morphology!Tchaikovsky Jews beep primeval?…
search instant travelers medical insurance online genesis company arvada co said,
September 14, 2009 at 9:21 pm
search instant travelers medical insurance online genesis company arvada co…
allocation claimants providing rosebush …